I hope to God that this catches on in the states

Slicker · Post by **Slicker** » Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44 am

Nuff' said

Diabolical · Post by **Diabolical** » Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:32 pm

Slicker wrote:Nuff' said

I hope it catches on in Mid-March, but then disappears in three years.

Eternal Padawan · Post by **Eternal Padawan** » Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:42 pm

I'm curious what they look like without panties.

jjreason · Post by **jjreason** » Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:34 pm

Dammit, why can't I see????

Slicker · Post by **Slicker** » Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:54 pm

Eternal Padawan wrote:I'm curious what they look like without panties.

The panties are built into the pants.

What you see is the entire pant (is that correct?).

Post by **vynsane** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:48 pm

too bad asian chicks that wear those are all svelte little hottie numbers. i mean, that's not too bad, but here we'd just have all the "big-boned" chicks wearing them, thinking they can pull it off. that's too bad.

anarky · Post by **anarky** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:45 pm

There should be laws requiring BAC.

(Body-appropriate clothing, in case you're wondering.)

There are many attractive larger women. But put them in a cutoff tank top and low-rise jeans with a thong hanging out, and they cease to be attractive and become, well, gross.

the vynsane asylum

I hope to God that this catches on in the states

I hope to God that this catches on in the states

Re: I hope to God that this catches on in the states